<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:pingback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/pingback/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>XML from the Coffee Shop</title>
    <link>http://www.marv-in.net/blog/</link>
    <description />
    <copyright>Marvin Smit</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 15:17:04 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>newtelligence dasBlog 1.7.5016.2</generator>
    <managingEditor>msmit@develop.com</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>msmit@develop.com</webMaster>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.marv-in.net/blog/Trackback,guid,ffb34077-4a39-4678-88ca-85b1e86e6bdb.aspx</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.marv-in.net/blog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.marv-in.net/blog/PermaLink,guid,ffb34077-4a39-4678-88ca-85b1e86e6bdb.aspx</pingback:target>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://www.marv-in.net/blog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=ffb34077-4a39-4678-88ca-85b1e86e6bdb</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Richard (Blewett) and I have talked about
   this subject often. Richard has finally found the time to write down <a href="http://www.dotnetconsult.co.uk/weblog2/PermaLink,guid,17bb7c88-aa39-464f-a5b1-4ac18932ceea.aspx">what's
   wrong with the current implementation of 'Recoverable Interchange'.</a> No, it's not
   the pipeline, messaging engine or adapter at fault. It's the XMLDisassembler!!!<img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.marv-in.net/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=ffb34077-4a39-4678-88ca-85b1e86e6bdb" /></body>
      <title>The 'not-so-very' Recoverable Interchange in BizTalk 2006 explained</title>
      <guid>http://www.marv-in.net/blog/PermaLink,guid,ffb34077-4a39-4678-88ca-85b1e86e6bdb.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://www.marv-in.net/blog/PermaLink,guid,ffb34077-4a39-4678-88ca-85b1e86e6bdb.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 15:17:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>Richard (Blewett) and I have talked about this subject often. Richard has finally found the time to write down &lt;a href='http://www.dotnetconsult.co.uk/weblog2/PermaLink,guid,17bb7c88-aa39-464f-a5b1-4ac18932ceea.aspx'&gt;what's
wrong with the current implementation of 'Recoverable Interchange'.&lt;/a&gt; No, it's not
the pipeline, messaging engine or adapter at fault. It's the XMLDisassembler!!!&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.marv-in.net/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=ffb34077-4a39-4678-88ca-85b1e86e6bdb"&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://www.marv-in.net/blog/CommentView,guid,ffb34077-4a39-4678-88ca-85b1e86e6bdb.aspx</comments>
      <category>BizTalk 2004</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.marv-in.net/blog/Trackback,guid,20dc5fb9-d580-4244-aba0-149c1f0348dd.aspx</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.marv-in.net/blog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.marv-in.net/blog/PermaLink,guid,20dc5fb9-d580-4244-aba0-149c1f0348dd.aspx</pingback:target>
      <wfw:comment>http://www.marv-in.net/blog/CommentView,guid,20dc5fb9-d580-4244-aba0-149c1f0348dd.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://www.marv-in.net/blog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=20dc5fb9-d580-4244-aba0-149c1f0348dd</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">It's been a while, but i hope this will
   make up for being quiet again. I've run across the question many times, but never
   found the time to really dive into it. Now that time was found. And attached is the
   result. It is not a 100% clean construct because BizTalk really tries to do its best
   to disallow access to internal classes and runtime. However, utilitzing some thread
   local storage and (what i think is) a reasonable assumption, this functoid is actually
   able to retrieve any of the message context properties in a receive port (no orchestrations
   required) <a href="http://www.marv-in.net/blog/content/binary/ContextAccessor.zip">ContextAccessor.zip
   (255.35 KB)</a><img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.marv-in.net/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=20dc5fb9-d580-4244-aba0-149c1f0348dd" /></body>
      <title>Accessing Context Properties from within a map in BizTalk</title>
      <guid>http://www.marv-in.net/blog/PermaLink,guid,20dc5fb9-d580-4244-aba0-149c1f0348dd.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://www.marv-in.net/blog/PermaLink,guid,20dc5fb9-d580-4244-aba0-149c1f0348dd.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 16:00:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>It's been a while, but i hope this will make up for being quiet again.

I've run across the question many times, but never found the time to really dive into it. Now that time was found. And attached is the result.

It is not a 100% clean construct because BizTalk really tries to do its best to disallow access to internal classes and runtime.

However, utilitzing some thread local storage and (what i think is) a reasonable assumption, this functoid is actually able to retrieve any of the message context properties in a receive port (no orchestrations required)


&lt;a href="http://www.marv-in.net/blog/content/binary/ContextAccessor.zip"&gt;ContextAccessor.zip
(255.35 KB)&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.marv-in.net/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=20dc5fb9-d580-4244-aba0-149c1f0348dd"&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://www.marv-in.net/blog/CommentView,guid,20dc5fb9-d580-4244-aba0-149c1f0348dd.aspx</comments>
      <category>BizTalk 2004</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.marv-in.net/blog/Trackback,guid,b09ccf4a-56fc-402f-8fad-7cdd2f06cc32.aspx</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.marv-in.net/blog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.marv-in.net/blog/PermaLink,guid,b09ccf4a-56fc-402f-8fad-7cdd2f06cc32.aspx</pingback:target>
      <wfw:comment>http://www.marv-in.net/blog/CommentView,guid,b09ccf4a-56fc-402f-8fad-7cdd2f06cc32.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://www.marv-in.net/blog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=b09ccf4a-56fc-402f-8fad-7cdd2f06cc32</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
      Ohhhhh... RC1... Sooo close we can almost taste it... or not?
   </p>
        <p>
      Anyways, time to head to Microsoft's site and grab that <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=19E21845-F5E3-4387-95FF-66788825C1AF&amp;displaylang=en">WinFX -
      .Net 3.0 RC1</a>, however you want to call it, and dive into WPF (Avelon), WCF (Indigo),
      WF (Almost WWF but really Windows Workflow Foundation) and White.. ehh... Hail.. ehhh..
      Pass.. ehh.. CardSpace :)
   </p>
        <p>
      We're entering a new dawning of development on the net, yet.. will the sky be bright
      or filled with dark clouds?
   </p>
        <p>
      Bravely we enter into this new world.
   </p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.marv-in.net/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=b09ccf4a-56fc-402f-8fad-7cdd2f06cc32" />
      </body>
      <title>Ehhh, .Net 3.0 RC1 release for .Net 2.0 :S (i.o.w WinFX RC1 for .Net 2.0 is here!!)</title>
      <guid>http://www.marv-in.net/blog/PermaLink,guid,b09ccf4a-56fc-402f-8fad-7cdd2f06cc32.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://www.marv-in.net/blog/PermaLink,guid,b09ccf4a-56fc-402f-8fad-7cdd2f06cc32.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2006 17:23:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
   Ohhhhh... RC1... Sooo close we can almost taste it... or not?
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   Anyways, time to head to Microsoft's site and grab that &lt;a href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=19E21845-F5E3-4387-95FF-66788825C1AF&amp;amp;displaylang=en"&gt;WinFX&amp;nbsp;-
   .Net 3.0 RC1&lt;/a&gt;, however you want to call it, and dive into WPF (Avelon), WCF (Indigo),
   WF (Almost WWF but really Windows Workflow Foundation) and White.. ehh... Hail.. ehhh..
   Pass.. ehh.. CardSpace :)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   We're entering a new dawning of development on the net, yet.. will the sky be bright
   or filled with dark clouds?
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   Bravely we enter into this new world.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.marv-in.net/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=b09ccf4a-56fc-402f-8fad-7cdd2f06cc32"&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://www.marv-in.net/blog/CommentView,guid,b09ccf4a-56fc-402f-8fad-7cdd2f06cc32.aspx</comments>
      <category>General</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.marv-in.net/blog/Trackback,guid,8e646717-c723-4f5a-8e6d-95e401cad519.aspx</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.marv-in.net/blog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.marv-in.net/blog/PermaLink,guid,8e646717-c723-4f5a-8e6d-95e401cad519.aspx</pingback:target>
      <wfw:comment>http://www.marv-in.net/blog/CommentView,guid,8e646717-c723-4f5a-8e6d-95e401cad519.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://www.marv-in.net/blog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=8e646717-c723-4f5a-8e6d-95e401cad519</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
      I can't even tell you what i've been doing, or i'd have to kill you... but.. just
      to get back into the atmosphere.....
   </p>
        <p>
      WinFX =&gt; .Net 3.0
   </p>
        <p>
      Sure, we're changing the runtime and core .... so, this must be a new version. ;p
   </p>
        <p>
       
   </p>
        <p>
      Can't wait untill the real .Net 3.0 core is released. Just imagine: "So, you are running
      .Net 3.0 on the .Net 2.0 core or .Net 3.0 core?".
   </p>
        <p>
      Now, What should you answer to that?
   </p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.marv-in.net/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=8e646717-c723-4f5a-8e6d-95e401cad519" />
      </body>
      <title>Inactive? Naahh... just not visible</title>
      <guid>http://www.marv-in.net/blog/PermaLink,guid,8e646717-c723-4f5a-8e6d-95e401cad519.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://www.marv-in.net/blog/PermaLink,guid,8e646717-c723-4f5a-8e6d-95e401cad519.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 15:32:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
   I can't even tell you what i've been doing, or i'd have to kill you... but.. just
   to get back into the atmosphere.....
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   WinFX =&amp;gt; .Net 3.0
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   Sure, we're changing the runtime and core .... so, this must be a new version. ;p
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   &amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   Can't wait untill the real .Net 3.0 core is released. Just imagine: "So, you are running
   .Net 3.0 on the .Net 2.0 core or .Net 3.0 core?".
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   Now, What should you answer to that?
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.marv-in.net/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=8e646717-c723-4f5a-8e6d-95e401cad519"&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://www.marv-in.net/blog/CommentView,guid,8e646717-c723-4f5a-8e6d-95e401cad519.aspx</comments>
      <category>General</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.marv-in.net/blog/Trackback,guid,c83e31b4-b94f-42be-a652-2cf0d1018c0d.aspx</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.marv-in.net/blog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.marv-in.net/blog/PermaLink,guid,c83e31b4-b94f-42be-a652-2cf0d1018c0d.aspx</pingback:target>
      <wfw:comment>http://www.marv-in.net/blog/CommentView,guid,c83e31b4-b94f-42be-a652-2cf0d1018c0d.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://www.marv-in.net/blog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=c83e31b4-b94f-42be-a652-2cf0d1018c0d</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
      The wait has been long and difficult, but it is here.... right now!
   </p>
        <p>
      BizTalk Server 2006 has gone RTM. 
   </p>
        <p>
          <a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/subscriptions/">For universal subscribers</a>
        </p>
        <p>
      Now... the waiting for 2008 starts ;)
   </p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.marv-in.net/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=c83e31b4-b94f-42be-a652-2cf0d1018c0d" />
      </body>
      <title>BizTalk Server 2006 RTM</title>
      <guid>http://www.marv-in.net/blog/PermaLink,guid,c83e31b4-b94f-42be-a652-2cf0d1018c0d.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://www.marv-in.net/blog/PermaLink,guid,c83e31b4-b94f-42be-a652-2cf0d1018c0d.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 10:26:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
   The wait has been long and difficult, but it is here.... right now!
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   BizTalk Server 2006 has gone RTM. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   &lt;a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/subscriptions/"&gt;For universal subscribers&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   Now... the waiting for 2008 starts ;)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.marv-in.net/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=c83e31b4-b94f-42be-a652-2cf0d1018c0d"&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://www.marv-in.net/blog/CommentView,guid,c83e31b4-b94f-42be-a652-2cf0d1018c0d.aspx</comments>
      <category>BizTalk 2004</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.marv-in.net/blog/Trackback,guid,1fd83d5b-5f8c-45b2-855f-ec07a66ed288.aspx</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.marv-in.net/blog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.marv-in.net/blog/PermaLink,guid,1fd83d5b-5f8c-45b2-855f-ec07a66ed288.aspx</pingback:target>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://www.marv-in.net/blog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=1fd83d5b-5f8c-45b2-855f-ec07a66ed288</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
      Dominick Baier has been working hard in the area of ClickOnce. He posted <a href="http://www.leastprivilege.com/BewareBeAwareOfClickOnceDefaultSettings.aspx">an
      excellent article on his blog </a>that goes into <a href="http://www.marv-in.net/blog/#aff125ae4-ff62-4618-8917-d00cff8a55f7">'the
      defaults' </a>of the 2.0 RTM ClickOnce technology.
   </p>
        <p>
      A must read before use!
   </p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.marv-in.net/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=1fd83d5b-5f8c-45b2-855f-ec07a66ed288" />
      </body>
      <title>ClickOnce , ClickTwice, harddisk empty???</title>
      <guid>http://www.marv-in.net/blog/PermaLink,guid,1fd83d5b-5f8c-45b2-855f-ec07a66ed288.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://www.marv-in.net/blog/PermaLink,guid,1fd83d5b-5f8c-45b2-855f-ec07a66ed288.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2006 11:30:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
   Dominick Baier has been working hard in the area of ClickOnce. He posted &lt;a href="http://www.leastprivilege.com/BewareBeAwareOfClickOnceDefaultSettings.aspx"&gt;an
   excellent article on his blog &lt;/a&gt;that goes into &lt;a href="http://www.marv-in.net/blog/#aff125ae4-ff62-4618-8917-d00cff8a55f7"&gt;'the
   defaults' &lt;/a&gt;of the 2.0 RTM ClickOnce technology.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   A must read before use!
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.marv-in.net/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=1fd83d5b-5f8c-45b2-855f-ec07a66ed288"&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://www.marv-in.net/blog/CommentView,guid,1fd83d5b-5f8c-45b2-855f-ec07a66ed288.aspx</comments>
      <category>General</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.marv-in.net/blog/Trackback,guid,7d7e6166-c273-44da-91a6-38a5128ae452.aspx</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.marv-in.net/blog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.marv-in.net/blog/PermaLink,guid,7d7e6166-c273-44da-91a6-38a5128ae452.aspx</pingback:target>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://www.marv-in.net/blog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=7d7e6166-c273-44da-91a6-38a5128ae452</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
      I've seen it more and more on the net. Is it that we dare to speak out more? or is
      there really a change in balance occuring?
   </p>
        <p>
      (Mis-?)Management being addressed and tech-leads are heard or leave!
   </p>
        <p>
      Looking at mini-Microsoft, a posts on Joel's blog and finally my own situation (and
      I'm sure many more out there). It is time for us to get this information into the
      open and expose the behavior that is currently being promoted in too many (not all)
      companies. Especially mid and larger companies have this tendency and should therefore
      take more action to prevent these situation from occuring. Why? Because it will make
      your stocks worth even more! (Did this work for management types?) ohh, and as side-effect
      you have motivated people.
   </p>
        <p>
          <br />
      This is my story:
   </p>
        <p>
      It was 1996 and a group of highly intelligent and fun-to-be-with friends asked me
      to join their newly founded company. Being focussed on the web, SGML and publishing
      I found it to be the best offer in a long time and happily accepted!
   </p>
        <p>
      As the years passed, the company merged with another small group and formed a 'internet
      powerhouse'. Combining technical expertise and business savvy into one company (Ayy!
      the beginning of the end). More years passed and, next to the many projects, the original
      product was still very much alive and growing. Abbandoning the project market and
      forming yet another company, the product was recognized for what is was and became
      the flagship of the new entity.
   </p>
        <p>
      Here's where the sadness enters the story. As the product grew and a larger customerbase
      was realised (which included governmental departments &amp; institution, world-wide
      renowned banks, etc) so did the need to have more management and middle management
      (We seemed to have a pretty stable development team for years). In rappid sucsession
      the CEO's, COO's, CFO's, etc. where hired and then dismissed again. In the mean time
      spending lots of revenue, earned by the core product, where wasted on 'brilliant management
      ideas' (read; stupid moneywasting CEO's wet-dreams). 
   </p>
        <p>
      I just have to mention the CEO that thought that 'him ab-sailing from one of the world's
      known football centers infront of the company personel' would boost morale or be fun
      somehow! Mr. DxxxHead, if you ever read this; "I still say its a stupid idea and think
      you're an overrated 2nd hand car salesman".
   </p>
        <p>
      While the flagship product still reached the upper regions of reports like "Forrester"
      and "CMWatch" (It's even been labeled 'Best of breed' by Forrester for Europe in WCM
      twice in 2005), management became more and more lost in the game of politics.
   </p>
        <p>
      This is the period in which the company culture switched from 'motivated by pride
      &amp; result' into 'a 9-5 place to stay so I get money'.
   </p>
        <p>
      Having gone through a number of re-shuffles the company finally reached a state where
      'the people that made it happen' where moved into obscurity, left or where ignored.
   </p>
        <p>
      Politics became the main game. I even saw we needed 'receive notification' turned
      on as managers started to say "I didn't get that mail from you". Yuck! Those where
      the kids we'de beat up during school-breaks for lying to the group! They still didn't
      get the message!
   </p>
        <p>
      So, where does it leave me? I started looking around as a realist for the first time
      (always have been an optimist) and saw the shape the company is in, and decided to
      leave.
   </p>
        <p>
      "It is a sad day for me, for the core system is my baby. I, together with a limited
      nr of others, have envisioned - designed - implemented - tested this systen since
      the 1.0 version (it's now at 5.1 at the time of this writing). 
   </p>
        <p>
      I like to compare it with being a father;
   </p>
        <p>
      The Core system is my child and I will always love it, however badly it behaves<br />
      My child has come home with a group of friends i dispise, and her boyfriend i hate!<br />
      My child is an adult now, and has to make her own choices,<br />
          time for me to step out (and make another child?)....
   </p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.marv-in.net/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=7d7e6166-c273-44da-91a6-38a5128ae452" />
      </body>
      <title>The end of a 10 year chapter.</title>
      <guid>http://www.marv-in.net/blog/PermaLink,guid,7d7e6166-c273-44da-91a6-38a5128ae452.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://www.marv-in.net/blog/PermaLink,guid,7d7e6166-c273-44da-91a6-38a5128ae452.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2005 09:46:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
   I've seen it more and more on the net. Is it that we dare to speak out more? or is
   there really a change in balance occuring?
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   (Mis-?)Management being addressed and tech-leads are heard or leave!
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   Looking at mini-Microsoft, a posts on Joel's blog and finally my own situation (and
   I'm sure many more out there). It is time for us to get this information into the
   open and expose the behavior that is currently being promoted in too many (not all)
   companies. Especially mid and larger companies have this tendency and should therefore
   take more action to prevent these situation from occuring. Why? Because it will make
   your stocks worth even more! (Did this work for management types?) ohh, and as side-effect
   you have motivated people.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   &lt;br&gt;
   This is my story:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   It was 1996 and a group of highly intelligent and fun-to-be-with friends asked me
   to join their newly founded company. Being focussed on the web, SGML and publishing
   I found it to be the best offer in a long time and happily accepted!
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   As the years passed, the company merged with another small group and formed a 'internet
   powerhouse'. Combining technical expertise and business savvy into one company (Ayy!
   the beginning of the end). More years passed and, next to the many projects, the original
   product was still very much alive and growing. Abbandoning the project market and
   forming yet another company, the product was recognized for what is was and became
   the flagship of the new entity.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   Here's where the sadness enters the story. As the product grew and a larger customerbase
   was realised (which included governmental departments &amp;amp; institution, world-wide
   renowned banks, etc) so did the need to have more management and middle management
   (We seemed to have a pretty stable development team for years). In rappid sucsession
   the CEO's, COO's, CFO's, etc. where hired and then dismissed again. In the mean time
   spending lots of revenue, earned by the core product, where wasted on 'brilliant management
   ideas' (read; stupid moneywasting CEO's wet-dreams). 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   I just have to mention the CEO that thought that 'him ab-sailing from one of the world's
   known football centers infront of the company personel' would boost morale or be fun
   somehow! Mr. DxxxHead, if you ever read this; "I still say its a stupid idea and think
   you're an overrated 2nd hand car salesman".
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   While the flagship product still reached the upper regions of reports like "Forrester"
   and "CMWatch" (It's even been labeled 'Best of breed' by Forrester for Europe in WCM
   twice in 2005), management became more and more lost in the game of politics.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   This is the period in which the company culture switched from 'motivated by pride
   &amp;amp; result' into 'a 9-5 place to stay so I get money'.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   Having gone through a number of re-shuffles the company finally reached a state where
   'the people that made it happen' where moved into obscurity, left or where ignored.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   Politics became the main game. I even saw we needed 'receive notification' turned
   on as managers started to say "I didn't get that mail from you". Yuck! Those where
   the kids we'de beat up during school-breaks for lying to the group! They still didn't
   get the message!
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   So, where does it leave me? I started looking around as a realist for the first time
   (always have been an optimist) and saw the shape the company is in, and decided to
   leave.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   "It is a sad day for me, for the core system is my baby. I, together with a limited
   nr of others, have envisioned - designed - implemented - tested this systen since
   the 1.0 version (it's now at 5.1 at the time of this writing). 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   I like to compare it with being a father;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   The Core system is my child and I will always love it, however badly it behaves&lt;br&gt;
   My child has come home with a group of friends i dispise, and her boyfriend i hate!&lt;br&gt;
   My child is an adult now, and has to make her own choices,&lt;br&gt;
   &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; time for me to step out (and make another child?)....
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.marv-in.net/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=7d7e6166-c273-44da-91a6-38a5128ae452"&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://www.marv-in.net/blog/CommentView,guid,7d7e6166-c273-44da-91a6-38a5128ae452.aspx</comments>
      <category>General</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.marv-in.net/blog/Trackback,guid,c522d935-73bc-4276-a4be-4acf67186e5f.aspx</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.marv-in.net/blog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.marv-in.net/blog/PermaLink,guid,c522d935-73bc-4276-a4be-4acf67186e5f.aspx</pingback:target>
      <wfw:comment>http://www.marv-in.net/blog/CommentView,guid,c522d935-73bc-4276-a4be-4acf67186e5f.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://www.marv-in.net/blog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=c522d935-73bc-4276-a4be-4acf67186e5f</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
      I know, I know... i haven't posted much lately and promise to better my ways as of
      1st of Nov.
   </p>
        <p>
      For now, the good news is that a number of RTM's have arrived in the subscribers section
      of MSDN.
   </p>
        <p>
          <a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/subscriptions/">Visual Studio 2005 Professional
      &amp; SQL Server 2005 Developers edition.</a>
        </p>
        <p>
      Ohhhh, the joy...
   </p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.marv-in.net/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=c522d935-73bc-4276-a4be-4acf67186e5f" />
      </body>
      <title>Visual Studio 2005 Prof &amp; SQL Server 2005 Dev &amp; .... are now available for MSDN subscribers</title>
      <guid>http://www.marv-in.net/blog/PermaLink,guid,c522d935-73bc-4276-a4be-4acf67186e5f.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://www.marv-in.net/blog/PermaLink,guid,c522d935-73bc-4276-a4be-4acf67186e5f.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2005 21:47:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
   I know, I know... i haven't posted much lately and promise to better my ways as of
   1st of Nov.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   For now, the good news is that a number of RTM's have arrived in the subscribers section
   of MSDN.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   &lt;a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/subscriptions/"&gt;Visual Studio 2005 Professional
   &amp;amp; SQL Server 2005 Developers edition.&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   Ohhhh, the joy...
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.marv-in.net/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=c522d935-73bc-4276-a4be-4acf67186e5f"&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://www.marv-in.net/blog/CommentView,guid,c522d935-73bc-4276-a4be-4acf67186e5f.aspx</comments>
      <category>General</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.marv-in.net/blog/Trackback,guid,0ed12b8e-01e0-47e9-8f24-c545f1a24006.aspx</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.marv-in.net/blog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.marv-in.net/blog/PermaLink,guid,0ed12b8e-01e0-47e9-8f24-c545f1a24006.aspx</pingback:target>
      <wfw:comment>http://www.marv-in.net/blog/CommentView,guid,0ed12b8e-01e0-47e9-8f24-c545f1a24006.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://www.marv-in.net/blog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=0ed12b8e-01e0-47e9-8f24-c545f1a24006</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
      I already notified you of the upcomming Biztalk 2006 @ Microsoft. I'm happy to announce
      the European version is now also planned and availalbe for registration.
   </p>
        <p>
          <a href="http://www.develop.com/training/course.aspx?id=304">Schedule date is November
      2005 in London</a>!
   </p>
        <p>
      Hope to see you all there.
   </p>
        <p>
       
   </p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.marv-in.net/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=0ed12b8e-01e0-47e9-8f24-c545f1a24006" />
      </body>
      <title>Guerrilla Biztalk 2006 planned in London too!</title>
      <guid>http://www.marv-in.net/blog/PermaLink,guid,0ed12b8e-01e0-47e9-8f24-c545f1a24006.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://www.marv-in.net/blog/PermaLink,guid,0ed12b8e-01e0-47e9-8f24-c545f1a24006.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2005 13:45:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
   I already notified you of the upcomming Biztalk 2006 @ Microsoft. I'm happy to announce
   the European version is now also planned and availalbe for registration.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   &lt;a href="http://www.develop.com/training/course.aspx?id=304"&gt;Schedule date is November
   2005 in London&lt;/a&gt;!
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   Hope to see you all there.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   &amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.marv-in.net/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=0ed12b8e-01e0-47e9-8f24-c545f1a24006"&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://www.marv-in.net/blog/CommentView,guid,0ed12b8e-01e0-47e9-8f24-c545f1a24006.aspx</comments>
      <category>BizTalk 2004</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.marv-in.net/blog/Trackback,guid,24dc9b77-ee2d-4b2c-b79e-5dc87399f776.aspx</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.marv-in.net/blog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.marv-in.net/blog/PermaLink,guid,24dc9b77-ee2d-4b2c-b79e-5dc87399f776.aspx</pingback:target>
      <wfw:comment>http://www.marv-in.net/blog/CommentView,guid,24dc9b77-ee2d-4b2c-b79e-5dc87399f776.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://www.marv-in.net/blog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=24dc9b77-ee2d-4b2c-b79e-5dc87399f776</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
      I've now come across several issues, like the BizTalk service restarting all the time
      or not being able to run configureFramework.exe correctly.
   </p>
        <p>
      After some searching &amp; spelunking(tm) I've found the NT Eventlog to be the culprit!
   </p>
        <p>
      As we all know Biztalk dumps tremendous amounts of logging information into the NT
      Eventlog. In certain circumstances (like configuring &amp; un-configuring a number
      of times) the eventlog might run into its configured limit. When this happens Biztalk
      kind of chokes. 
   </p>
        <p>
      The error of not being able to write to the eventlog, is being written to the NT eventlog.
   </p>
        <p>
      Ehhh.. anyone got a problem with that?
   </p>
        <p>
      Just remember to set up your development system using a 'overwrite when needed' configured
      NT Eventlog
   </p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.marv-in.net/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=24dc9b77-ee2d-4b2c-b79e-5dc87399f776" />
      </body>
      <title>Biztalk 2004 and the Eventlog</title>
      <guid>http://www.marv-in.net/blog/PermaLink,guid,24dc9b77-ee2d-4b2c-b79e-5dc87399f776.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://www.marv-in.net/blog/PermaLink,guid,24dc9b77-ee2d-4b2c-b79e-5dc87399f776.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2005 10:56:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
   I've now come across several issues, like the BizTalk service restarting all the time
   or not being able to run configureFramework.exe correctly.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   After some searching &amp;amp; spelunking(tm) I've found the NT Eventlog to be the culprit!
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   As we all know Biztalk dumps tremendous amounts of logging information into the NT
   Eventlog. In certain circumstances (like configuring &amp;amp; un-configuring a number
   of times) the eventlog might run into its configured limit. When this happens Biztalk
   kind of chokes. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   The error of not being able to write to the eventlog, is being written to the NT eventlog.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   Ehhh.. anyone got a problem with that?
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   Just remember to set up your development system using a 'overwrite when needed' configured
   NT Eventlog
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.marv-in.net/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=24dc9b77-ee2d-4b2c-b79e-5dc87399f776"&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://www.marv-in.net/blog/CommentView,guid,24dc9b77-ee2d-4b2c-b79e-5dc87399f776.aspx</comments>
      <category>BizTalk 2004</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.marv-in.net/blog/Trackback,guid,1813483a-98a0-4b86-9d86-e90b25b39043.aspx</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.marv-in.net/blog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.marv-in.net/blog/PermaLink,guid,1813483a-98a0-4b86-9d86-e90b25b39043.aspx</pingback:target>
      <wfw:comment>http://www.marv-in.net/blog/CommentView,guid,1813483a-98a0-4b86-9d86-e90b25b39043.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://www.marv-in.net/blog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=1813483a-98a0-4b86-9d86-e90b25b39043</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
      Windows Vista (codename Longhorn) Beta 1 has become available to <a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com">MSDN</a> (Subscribers),
      MVP's , etc. etc.
   </p>
        <p>
      Go get it now!
   </p>
        <p>
      Ps: It does run in VMWare 4.5 (using XP as guest OS).
   </p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.marv-in.net/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=1813483a-98a0-4b86-9d86-e90b25b39043" />
      </body>
      <title>Asta la Longhorn, baby</title>
      <guid>http://www.marv-in.net/blog/PermaLink,guid,1813483a-98a0-4b86-9d86-e90b25b39043.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://www.marv-in.net/blog/PermaLink,guid,1813483a-98a0-4b86-9d86-e90b25b39043.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2005 08:19:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
   Windows Vista (codename Longhorn) Beta 1 has become available to &lt;a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com"&gt;MSDN&lt;/a&gt; (Subscribers),
   MVP's , etc. etc.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   Go get it now!
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   Ps: It does run in VMWare 4.5 (using XP as guest OS).
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.marv-in.net/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=1813483a-98a0-4b86-9d86-e90b25b39043"&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://www.marv-in.net/blog/CommentView,guid,1813483a-98a0-4b86-9d86-e90b25b39043.aspx</comments>
      <category>General</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>